Engelskspråkig media

USA is not at war with Portland

Benjamin Haas is advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization that challenges America to live up to its ideals. He served as an intelligence officer in the Army and was deployed to Afghanistan twice. The views expressed in this commentary belong to the author. View more opinions at CNN.…

Benjamin Haas is advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization that challenges America to live up to its perfects. He worked as an intelligence officer in the Army and was deployed to Afghanistan two times. The views expressed in this commentary belong to the author. View more opinions at CNN.

(CNN) The Trump administration’s militarized reaction to the demonstrations in Portland and its rhetoric of war— along with the President’s threats to deploy federal law enforcement to other significant cities— position a severe hazard to both the American people and our democracy.

Disconcerting videos show law enforcement officers from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plucking protesters from the streets of Portland and packing them in unmarked lorries prior to driving away. The representatives, dressed in the very same camouflage pattern that I used as an Army intelligence officer in Afghanistan, are not easily recognizable either by name or by agency. US Customs and Border Protection– an agency under the DHS– confessed to being involved in detaining protesters and issued a declaration to CNN that checked out, “Violent anarchists have organized events in Portland over the last a number of weeks with willful intent to damage and destroy federal property, as well as, hurt federal officers and agents. These criminal actions will not be tolerated.”
Last week, the US Lawyer for the District of Oregon asked for an examination into the federal action, and the Inspectors General of both the DHS and the Justice Department have released examinations into claims the federal police personnel acted poorly.
But Chad Wolf, the acting secretary of DHS, has actually called the protesters “violent extremists” and repeatedly cast them as dangerous bad guys while the President retweeted a post comparing the protesters to a “domestic terrorist paramilitary group.” Teams of tactical border officers comparable to the ones deployed in Portland have been sent to Seattle
Blurring the line between the military and law enforcement is a risky proposal, with Portland offering a striking look of the outcomes. The DHS officers in Portland are more similar to the special operators and the 10 th Mountain Division infantry soldiers I supported in Afghanistan than the law enforcement officer I anticipate to see serving and securing American communities.
Except there is no war in the United States, and law enforcement organizations ought to not be qualified and geared up to act as if they remain in one. Yet the Trump administration would have us believe that protesters are enemies who should be defeated in combat. And against this backdrop, the federal representatives acting at the request of the Trump administration have actually acted in ways that are unacceptable even in armed conflict– collaring apparently serene protesters and beating others who positioned no significant danger. Unsurprisingly, the militarized federal action and the heavy-handed methods have intensified the state of affairs in Portland, and Mayor Ted Wheeler was tear gassed on Thursday when he joined crowds of protesters.
As if plain observations from Portland weren’t encouraging enough, research studies recommend that militarized police is unhelpful for cops and bad for neighborhood security. One study in 2018, for instance, discovered that “militarized policing fails to enhance officer safety or reduce regional crime” and “might diminish authorities track record in the mass public.” Another study discovered a “positive and statistically substantial relationship” between a Defense Department program that funnels surplus military equipment to state and regional law enforcement agencies and “casualties from officer-involved shootings.”
The Trump administration’s highly militarized police approach likewise presents possible hazards for the military. Public trust in the military is high, but confusion about its role or a false perception that it is associated with these federal demonstration reactions might harm its relationship with society. This might be, in part, why, throughout a recent Capitol Hill hearing about the armed force’s involvement in protest actions in June, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Personnel General Mark Milley noted the value of maintaining a “visual difference” between “that which is military, and that which is cops.”
With all of these drawbacks, it must maybe come as not a surprise that the United States has long cherished preserving a separation between the military and law enforcement. There are minimal exceptions, consisting of the Insurrection Act, which Trump recommended he would utilize to release active-duty military workers in action to protests in June.
After satisfying stiff public opposition from retired military leaders and his own Defense Secretary, Mark Esper, Trump pulled back from this hazard. Now, by releasing federal paramilitary law enforcement aspects, the President has actually discovered a method to however attain the very same impact: utilizing the armed force’s image to frighten and break down on protesters.
It appears Trump is trying to prevent the speedy pushback he provoked from former high-ranking military officials when he thought about wielding active-duty military soldiers in June. And in doing so, he’s trashing the spirit of the American concept that separates the military from law enforcement. This is more like the conduct of foreign authoritarians, not United States presidents.
Portland has actually made clear the harmful impacts of militarized police. Trump might feel difficult by releasing soldier-like federal law enforcement officers to scare Portland. As usual, he appears motivated by his own desire to present himself as a strongman and please his political base. His actions do not serve the very best interests of our democracy, the American individuals, great policing or the armed force. It appears that other cities across the nation will just become extra cases in point.
This short article has actually been modified to clarify that federal representatives including some outside the Department of Homeland Security nabbed apparently serene protesters and beat others who posed no meaningful risk.

Läs mer