Engelskspråkig media

Portland demonstrations stimulate House Democrats to require probe into usage of federal officers against protesters

William Cummings USA TODAYPublished 4:56 PM EDT Jul 23, 2020The Democratic chairs of three House committees are calling for the inspectors general for the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security to investigate the use of force by federal law enforcement officers against anti-police brutality protesters. In a joint letter to Michael Horowitz, the DOJ inspector general,…

William Cummings

Published 4: 56 PM EDT Jul 23, 2020

The Democratic chairs of three House committees are requiring the inspectors general for the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security to investigate using force by federal police officers versus anti-police brutality protesters.

In a joint letter to Michael Horowitz, the DOJ inspector general, and Joseph Cuffari, inspector general for DHS, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, and Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney on Sunday stated the Trump administration appears “to have significantly mistreated emergency situation authorities to validate making use of force against Americans exercising their right to peaceful assembly.”

The lawmakers mentioned current reports of protesters being swept off the streets in Portland, Oregon, by unknown federal representatives as evidence that “this abuse of resources and personnel remains a growing hazard.”

” Accordingly, we compose to request an examination by your offices into the use of federal police by the Chief law officer and the Performing Secretary of Homeland Security to suppress First Modification secured activities in Washington, D.C., Portland, and other neighborhoods across the United States,” they composed.

More: Portland, Oregon, cops state Saturday gathering a riot after another night of demonstration, unrest

They stated in some instances individuals could not inform the distinction in between the federal agents and “far-right extremists in the area who used similar military equipment.” They described Customs and Border Patrol representatives taking up people and apprehending them without identifying themselves as federal police or informing the detainees of their rights.

” Not only is this irresponsible and dangerous, however it is an offense of Constitutional rights,” the Democratic lawmakers stated.

Protests versus cops cruelty and racial discrimination broke out throughout the U.S. after the death of George Floyd, a Black male who passed away after a Minneapolis law enforcement officer knelt on his neck for almost 9 minutes. Some of the protests deteriorated into violence against police and robbery.

President Donald Trump has actually frequently conflated the whole demonstration movement, which is generally serene, with those episodes of violence and damage. He has called for an extreme police action, threatening to step in with federal soldiers in cities where he thinks local, usually Democratic, leaders have been too soft.

Last week, Portland cops broke down to avoid protesters from developing an autonomous zone, comparable to one previously established in Seattle, about which Trump repeatedly knocked regional politicians for permitting it to continue. In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Trump claimed police cleared the “Capitol Hill Inhabited Protest” in Seattle earlier this month due to the fact that federal forces were ” entering that following day.”

On Saturday, Portland authorities stated the presentations a riot after hundreds of protesters got into a structure and set it ablaze and began dumpster fires.

Trump declared, without proof, using federal police in Portland had actually prevented the city from being overrun by protesters.

” If you look at what’s gone on in Portland — those are anarchists, and we’ve taken a very hard stand,” Trump said. “If we didn’t take a stand in Portland– you know we’ve arrested much of these leaders — if we didn’t take that stand, today you would have a problem like you — they were going to lose Portland.”

” We are attempting to help Portland, not harm it. Their management has, for months, lost control of the anarchists and agitators. They are missing out on in action,” Trump tweeted the night prior to. “We must secure Federal home, AND OUR INDIVIDUALS. These were not simply protesters, these are the genuine deal!”

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler denounced making use of federal agents in his city, stating he did not request the administration’s assistance. Both of Oregon’s senators have actually required examinations into using the federal police officers in Portland.

In addition to the reported detentions in Portland, Nadler, Thompson and Maloney indicated the June 1 clearing of protesters outside the White House as an example of what they considered incorrect use of federal force against protesters.

They stated ” federal authorities in riot gear utilized chemical representatives, smoke, and rubber bullets to violently get rid of protestors from Lafayette Square– so that the President could have a photo-op in front of the historical St. John’s Church.”

The Democratic leaders stated the “legal basis for this usage of force has never ever been described” and they said “it is not at all clear” that Chief Law Officer William Barr and acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf “are authorized to release federal police officers in this way.”

” The Lawyer General of the United States does not have unconfined authority to direct thousands of federal law enforcement workers to arrest and apprehend American residents exercising their First Modification rights.”

On June 26, Trump issued an executive order to provide “personnel to assist with the security of Federal monoliths, memorials, statues, or property.” Nadler, Thompson and Maloney wrote it appeared Wolf was using that order “as validation for detaining American people in the dead of night.”

” The Administration’s insistence on releasing these forces over the objections of state and local authorities suggest that these techniques have little to do with public safety, however more to do with political gamesmanship.”

Contributing: Lorenzo Reyes, USA TODAY

Läs mer